Which is better cone crusher or jaw crusher?

Author: Shirley

May. 06, 2024

115

0

0

Jaw Crusher VS Cone Crusher: 9 Key Differences

Jaw Crusher VS Cone Crusher: 9 Key Differences

Within the realm of mining machinery, crushers play a vital role as they prepare minerals for subsequent processes, ensuring a solid foundation for future production stages.

Click here to get more.

To expedite the crushing process effectively, selecting the appropriate crusher is essential. Popular choices include jaw crushers, cone crushers, impact crushers, vertical shaft impact crushers, and hammer crushers, each tailored for different materials and production needs.

A key comparison lies between jaw crushers and cone crushers, which, despite similar basic principles, exhibit numerous differences.

Jaw Crushers: Best for Coarse Crushing

Jaw crushers stand out for their uncomplicated structure, consistent reliability, and cost-effectiveness. They feature an adjustable discharge opening and require minimal height difference for plant layout. Notably, jaw crushers boast a substantial crushing ratio, capable of transforming materials over 1000mm into particles smaller than 100mm. In sand production and crushing operations, jaw crushers are favored for coarse crushing materials with compressive strength below 320 MPa.

Thus, for handling large rock sizes, a jaw crusher is often the superior choice.

 

 

Cone Crushers: Ideal for Medium to Fine Crushing with Consistent Particle Shape

In contrast, cone crushers are designed for breaking down raw materials in industries such as metallurgy, construction, road building, and chemicals. With categories based on crushing principles and particle sizes, cone crushers are prevalent in mining, smelting, construction materials, infrastructure, and chemical sectors. They excel in offering a high crushing ratio, efficiency, low energy requirements, and consistently uniform product sizes, making them suitable for medium and fine crushing of various ores and rocks.

For smaller, harder materials, cone crushers are recommended. Their lamination crushing technique also ensures a desirable cubical shape in the final product.

 

 

Jaw Crusher vs Cone Crusher: Highlighting 9 Key Distinctions

For those uncertain about the differences between jaw and cone crushers, it’s crucial to understand their unique characteristics. Here's a comparison based on nine key differences:

1. Varied Working Mechanisms

The jaw crusher utilizes a curved extrusion mechanism, where materials are crushed between a movable and fixed jaw within the crushing chamber.

Conversely, the cone crusher operates on a lamination principle, with the mantle moving towards the concave to crush materials effectively.

2. Distinct Production Characteristics

Key production traits of jaw crushers versus cone crushers include:

Feeding size: Jaw crushers accommodate larger input sizes up to 1200mm, whereas cone crushers typically handle materials below 560mm.

Production capacity: Cone crushers offer higher output capacities, reaching up to 2130t/h compared to jaw crushers’ approximate maximum of 1500t/h.

Compressive strength: Both crushers handle compressive strengths around 300-350MPa.

Note: Specific data are based on modeled jaw and cone crushers.

3. Suitability for Different Materials

Jaw crushers are versatile for processing various materials, including pebbles, granite, limestone, and barite.

Cone crushers, however, are better suited for harder materials like granite, river pebbles, and basalt.

4. Placement within Crushing Plants

Generally used for primary crushing, jaw crushers have wide feed openings suitable for large rocks.

In contrast, cone crushers, with smaller feed openings, are often deployed for secondary or tertiary crushing tasks.

If you are looking for more details, kindly visit Chunlei.

5. Range of Applications

Jaw crushers are adaptable for use in large, medium, and small-scale sand and gravel production plants. Meanwhile, cone crushers are more appropriate for medium to large-scale operations.

6. Size and Structural Differences

Jaw crushers are generally more compact compared to cone crushers. Structurally, cone crushers are 1.7 to 2 times heavier and 2 to 3 times taller, thus requiring more investment for the associated plant infrastructure.

7. Grain Shape of Final Products

Due to their crushing mechanism, cone crushers excel in providing superior grain shapes. Jaw crushers often necessitate additional shaping equipment to achieve the same level of cubicity.

8. Price Variations

Given their intricate designs and features, cone crushers typically come with a higher price tag compared to jaw crushers.

9. Maintenance Costs

Both crusher types require regular upkeep. Although cone crushers demand higher initial investments, their lower failure rates, longer wear part lifespans, and convenient maintenance processes can translate into long-term savings on labor and materials.

Determining the Suitable Choice: Jaw or Cone Crusher?

Understanding the nine outlined differences between jaw crushers and cone crushers aids in making an informed decision. Consider these factors:

First, evaluate the investment cost. If both crusher types meet production needs, opt for a more cost-effective jaw crusher.

Second, for extensive production lines, a cone crusher is preferable.

Third, for wet cohesive ores, a jaw crusher is ideal, while for flaky or hard strip ores, a cone crusher is more suitable.

If indecision persists, consult ZENITH engineers for tailored recommendations. Based on specific circumstances and requirements, they will suggest the optimal jaw or cone crusher.

Understanding the Distinction between Jaw Crusher and Cone Crusher

Jaw crushers and cone crushers are staple crushing equipment in industries such as mining, construction, and aggregate production. Their respective advantages make them suitable under different operational conditions.

Jaw Crusher Highlights:

  • Employs a "V-shaped" chamber, creating a squeezing action between fixed and movable jaws.
  • Primarily used for reducing stones and lump materials into medium-grained gravel.
  • Best suited as a primary crusher for handling large, hard rocks like basalt and granite.

Cone Crusher Highlights:

  • Utilizes a rotating cone-shaped mantle inside a bowl-shaped concave.
  • Designed for secondary or tertiary crushing, breaking materials into finer pieces.
  • Excels in producing finer products by applying compression rather than impact force.

In summarizing, the primary differences lie in processing capacity, production capability, and final product quality. Jaw crushers are predominantly used for primary crushing stages, while cone crushers cater to secondary crushing.

Contact us

Related Links

The company ranks among the best jaw rock crusher suppliers worldwide, offering comprehensive solutions. Our specialized team is dedicated to assisting you in finding the optimal products.

Comments

Please Join Us to post.

0

0/2000

Guest Posts

If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us.

Your Name: (required)

Your Email: (required)

Subject:

Your Message: (required)

0/2000