How to Choose Prototype Injection Molding?

Time to read: 8 min

View Details

Is prototype injection molding an oxymoron? If you&#;re like most designers, you&#;ve learned that plastic injection molding is for high volumes of production-quality (i.e., non-prototype) parts. Maybe you&#;ve also heard that steel injection molds are for higher volumes, aluminum injection molds are for lower volumes, and that both types of molds are too expensive for prototypes.

If any of this sounds familiar, it&#;s time to unlearn some of what you&#;ve been told and to re-think your prototyping and production options. Yes, plastic injection molding is a high-volume production process. Yet there are also times to use it for prototyping &#; and for low-volume production as well. As for injection molds, there&#;s more to consider than just aluminum vs. steel.

Do prototype injection molds come at a cost? Yes, but there are ways to reduce your expenses, as this article will explain. Do injection molds take a long time to produce? If you expect mold-making to take several months, you&#;ll be pleasantly surprised to learn that the right manufacturing partner can produce tooling in just a few weeks. Take a look at the big picture and consider your part design and material selection along with tooling costs and machining times. And remember that help is available when you share your part design with Fictiv. For example, if your design doesn&#;t contain enough draft, our DFM experts will suggest a larger draft angle so that your parts eject smoothly.

Fictiv&#;s Injection Molding Design Guide contains advice about draft angles for prototype injection molding. This free resource is available for download.

Part Design and Prototype Injection Molding

How mature is your part design? If you&#;re not ready for manufacturing, you&#;re probably still in the prototyping stage. But which type of prototype do you need?

• Proof-of-concept prototypes let you evaluate scale, form, and maybe some basic functions.
• Looks-like prototypes let you visualize the product&#;s final appearance.
• Works-like prototypes let you validate form, fit, and function.
• Pre-production prototypes let you validate both the product&#;s final appearance and its utility.    

This isn&#;t the only way to categorize prototypes, but the above list provides a framework for what follows.

3D Printed Prototypes vs. Injection-Molded Prototypes

Most proof-of-concept prototypes and looks-like prototypes don&#;t warrant the cost of an injection-molding tool. That&#;s because the designer usually needs just one or two parts, and it&#;s difficult to justify the expense of an injection mold when you&#;re spreading the total tooling cost across just a few parts. 

Works-like prototypes and pre-production prototypes are a different story. Often, a designer needs part volumes that are measured in tens rather than in single digits. Depending on the quantity then, it might make sense to use injection molding instead of 3D printing, which does not require tooling but is not the intended production process. 

Consider the difference between molding one proof-of-concept prototype vs. 100 pre-production prototypes. In both instances, let&#;s say the cost of the tool is $10,000. For one proof-of-concept prototype, the per-part tooling cost is $10,000. For 100 pre-production prototypes, the per-part tooling cost is $100. That&#;s a big difference.        

The table below explains what to consider when comparing 3D printing vs. injection molding for prototyping.

Now think about design for manufacturability (DFM), the process of designing parts in such a way that they&#;re easy to manufacture. Let&#;s say you 3D-print some components that you then assemble. They fit together flawlessly and let you test the product&#;s functionality. 

That&#;s great, but what if injection molding these same parts results in production failure? How can that happen? Your 3D-printed prototypes might be perfect but don&#;t assume that level of perfection will translate seamlessly into the perfect injection molded part.

Design Rules, Part Features, and Tolerances

3D printing has different design rules, such as minimum wall thickness, than injection molding. That&#;s important to remember because walls that are too thick, too thin, or non-uniform are a frequent cause of failure in production injection molding. The best way to avoid this problem is to use prototype injection molding to create parts that let you identify any production challenges.

There&#;s more to consider as well. The file formats for 3D printing and plastic injection molding are different. Specifically, the STL files that are used in 3D printing define objects in terms of a triangle mesh. By contrast, the CAD files that contain the designs for injection molded parts are parameter-driven.To use your 3D printing files with injection molding, you&#;ll need to convert them from a mesh to a shape to a solid.   

3D printing and injection molding also have different tolerances, or allowable part-to-part variations. In most additive manufacturing technologies, the dimensional tolerance is at least 0.1 mm. Therefore, the deviations in 3D printing are greater than with injection molding. Plus, injection molding has two types of tolerances: commercial and fine.

Ready for some good news? Fictiv provides expert DFM assistance through 3D visualization for injection molded part design. There&#;s also this handy online checklist so that you can determine if you&#;re ready to go from 3D printing to injection molding. And remember that you don&#;t have to wait until your parts are production-ready to get injection-molded samples. 

Acrylic is a commodity plastic that can be used for injection-molded prototypes

Material Selection and Prototype Injection Molding

Prototype injection molding and production injection molding can both use the same plastics. However, abrasive materials such as glass-filled nylon will cause prototype injection molds to wear more quickly. (That&#;s because prototype molds are usually made from softer materials.) Still, if you&#;re planning to prototype 100 parts, wear is less of an issue than it would be with a full-scale production run of 10,000 parts.   

Commodity Plastics vs. Engineering Plastics

If your part design is still in its early stages, you might decide to use commodity plastics that are less expensive, even if they don&#;t have the same mechanical properties as your intended production materials. For example, PEEK is an engineering plastic that&#;s used in some medical devices. It costs significantly more than other polymers and may have a high minimum order quantity (MOQ) if your supplier doesn&#;t buy it in large enough volumes to receive a discount. 

For a works-like prototype, you could use a less expensive material like polyphenylsulfone (PPSU). In fact, PPSU might be a fine choice. Yet using anything other than PEEK won&#;t provide a full test of your part&#;s moldability. Since PPSU and PEEK are both available as 3D-printing filaments, could you use additive manufacturing instead? You&#;d save on tooling costs, and you could use the plastic that you want. Sounds simple, right?

All Part Samples Aren&#;t the Same

That approach might not provide what you need. 3D-printed materials don&#;t have the same end-use properties as their injection-molded counterparts. For example, 3D-printed PEEK isn&#;t as strong as injection-molded PEEK. And if your part is for a medical device, you&#;ll need representative samples for the first article inspection (FAI). The best way to get them is to use the same material and the same process as you plan to use for full-scale production. That&#;s injection molding.

If you upload your part design to Fictiv, you can ask our DFM experts for more information.

Prototype Injection Molds: Beyond Steel vs. Aluminum

What&#;s the difference between a prototype injection mold and a production injection mold? It&#;s not about the metal that the mold is made from. Production molds can be made from aluminum or steel and prototype molds can be made from aluminum or steel. And it doesn&#;t end there. There are several different steels that are used in injection molds &#; and there isn&#;t just one kind of aluminum.     

SPI Classes and Prototype Parts

There are also SPI classes for mold finish to consider. In the table below, look at SPI Class 105. That&#;s the one for prototype quantities.

What about the other SPI mold classes? Ideally, a production injection mold is designed and built for the fastest cycle times, the highest quality parts, and the longest tooling life (i.e., cycles). For prototype injection molds, long tool life is less important than part quality, especially for a few FAIs (first article inspections). Cycle time is also less important, at least if your goal in prototyping is to produce, say, 100 representative pre-production prototype parts.

Aluminum vs. Soft and Semi-Hardened Steel vs. Hardened Steel Molds

Yes, the metal that your mold is made of plays an important role in all of this. But you have more choices than just aluminum vs. steel. Specifically, you can choose:

Link to Shbury

• Aluminum in different grades
• Soft and semi-hardened steel in different grades
• Hardened steel in different grades

Aluminum is your least expensive choice, but it won&#;t produce injection-molded parts with tolerances that are as tight, or precise, as those with steel molds. That&#;s an issue if tight tolerances are required, but it can also affect tolerance stack-ups in assemblies with several injection molded parts. Aluminum injection molds can be machined to tolerances of +/- 0.005 inches, but steel molds can be machined to tolerances as tight as +/-0.001 inches.  

Soft and semi-hardened steels typically cost twice as much as aluminum but don&#;t rule them out for prototype injection molds. These steels can achieve tighter tolerances and aren&#;t so difficult to machine that it takes months to cut a tool. When you work with Fictiv, you can get prototype steel molds in as little as 10 to 14 days.

Generally, hardened steel is used with production injection molds. It&#;s more expensive than soft or semi-hardened steels, but hardened steel lasts longer (i.e., more cycles) and can achieve tighter tolerances. Prototyping doesn&#;t have to produce millions of parts, of course, but what if you need tight tolerances for medical, aerospace, or other demanding applications? Aluminum just won&#;t do.

Multiple Mold Materials and MUD Dies

Fortunately, injection molding supports the use of multiple mold materials. For example, the base of a prototype mold could be made of aluminum or soft or semi-hardened steel. The inserts could then be made of soft, semi-hardened, or hardened steel. If your mold requires moving components such as lifters, those components could be made of steel as well.

There are also master unit die (MUD) inserts with a standard mold frame and customized, removable inserts.  MUD molds, as they are called, can lower the cost of initial tooling by as much as 66%. Yet they still support the complexity that many designers need for prototyping. If you need to modify your design, as is often the case with prototypes, a toolmaker can modify just the insert.

Finally, prototype injection molding ensures that your mold uses the right gate type and location so that the mold cavity fills evenly and the plastic is held under pressure long enough to produce parts with consistent quality. An injection molder can use mold-flow-analysis software instead, but that won&#;t put a part in your hands now, will it?     

Ask Fictiv About Prototype Injection Molding

Fictiv operates a global network of highly-vetted and managed manufacturing partners for injection molding s and can help you take your product from prototyping through production. Because we offer a wide range of capabilities through a single platform, including both 3D printing and injection molding, you can use the process that you need when you need it. You won&#;t find that type of one-stop shopping everywhere, and we can produce complex parts (including prototypes) at blazing speeds.

Finding an exemplary prototype injection molding service determines the quality of the molding process and the results. Therefore choosing a suitable service provider is essential to get the desired high-quality results. In addition, a good service provider should have excellent compliance management, an innovative team, and the required production volume capacity. Today, we will discuss what factors we should consider in finding the right prototype injection molding services.

An innovative design team

When it comes to the molding aspect, then the design is an essential factor. You must ensure that the design team understands your requirements to get the desired results. The prototype injection molding team should have the capability of providing minimum design parts by understanding the process efficiently. This will reduce the time and cost involved in production. As a result, more efficient design and development projects will come into the picture.

Moreover, the design team should be involved early to provide substantial support. Otherwise, it can be an issue for clients with limited resources and skill sets to create a good design. The overall budget decision is also made by the design prototype and the parts involved in it. To get the proper return on investment, a capable design team should be a must before choosing a prototype injection molding service.

Volume and capacity of production

The following important factor to consider is the volume and capacity of production supported by the service provider. For instance, you require 2 lakh parts, but the company can produce only half in that period. Then, your order will be delayed, and you will face an extended downtime. Therefore, the company should have a suitable molder capacity. Generally, low to medium-capacity injection molders can produce around 10,000 parts quickly. The small-scale production units are best for clients looking for only prototype designs for experiments or testing.

There are several aspects where large production units are not required, such as medical devices, aero engineering parts, etc. So, a low or medium-level production company will be a prudent choice. On the other hand, if a company requires a large production number, then bulk production support should be preferred. Such production units can provide up to 7,50,000 units, especially for small-sized molds.

Complete service support

Whether you want design support, production support, or both, the service provider should offer a complete service spectrum. This will help save time and effort in opting for services from different providers. The money and time invested in research and communication with different service providers will be saved. Moreover, outsourcing everything from one point will minimize transportation costs. Without considering any limitation of the type and volume of the plastic parts, you should get one-stop manufacturing support. The early design discussion should provide complete support for building optimal designs which hampers no aspect of designing and quality while matching the budget needs.

A service provider should be able to enter the early design process irrespective of the design type. In addition, they should have proper production support to facilitate product building with high efficiency. You should also ponder the extended services the prototype injection molding services provide. This spectrum includes part design, prototyping, flow analysis, final packaging, etc. This is the usual segment of required services for processing the molds.

Compliance management

Sometimes the clients compromise the specifications of the products due to compliance management. This is also a sign of a weak design team. So choose a reliable prototype injection molding service provider you can trust throughout the process. The client should be able to get the desired design of the mold without compromising any design aspect.

Moreover, the company should follow all the compliances required to meet the international standards of the prototype injection molding services. It will help in maintaining the quality of the produced results. Therefore, the company should have the expertise to manage the design process efficiently without getting stuck into desired design requirements and compliance applications.

Customer service support

The building of good B2B relationships requires strong customer service support. This helps in clarifying the process of designing and manufacturing whenever required. Moreover, you will also get peace of mind when you know that your investment has been made in the right place. This is especially required for complicated projects which require higher team support and involvement. Moreover, communication between the clients and the prototype injection molding service provider is also crucial. This emphasizes building a transparent channel of information between both parties. This provides the required sensitivity to a project which is suitable for higher customer satisfaction.

Available resin

The resin or material selection is directly associated with the production and design. You will receive all the desired material options if you are associated with a good prototype injection molding service. However, as per the design and the use purpose, the material requirement can vary. So the availability of suitable resin material is a significant factor in determining the right service provider. Different resins have different properties, such as flexibility, durability, moldability, heat resistance, etc.

Organic material is considered the best option for product manufacturing. Then there are other required materials such as filler, additives, etc. A good service provider can also suggest the appropriate material type to reduce the cost of production without hampering product quality.

Product application

The product application as per the pre-determined objective is also a determining factor. When you start the design process, you begin with a set objective for using the product. A good company will provide suggestions for product application throughout the process. Moreover, the final results will not be compromised in any way to get the required results. It would be best if you got guidance from the company to build an efficient product. The prototype injection molding service should consider the budget and final use to advise upon the product application.

Research in terms of product application is a good option. However, it is also very time-consuming and resource-consuming. This may also increase your budget. But a service provider with enough industry experience will require less user-purpose research as they will already have plenty of supportive data. This will reduce time consumption as well as the budget.

Technological availability

After the material, technological advancement plays a significant role in determining the right prototype injection molding services. Technology advancements determine the time taken in the production and the final quality finish. Moreover, if the technological availability is limited, customers will also have to limit their design and idea approach. So before finalizing the prototype injection molding services, the technological availability should be confirmed to support the project. Moreover, getting access to the latest technological applications can help in further advancing the design and production process.

Quality assurance

Quality assurance is a sensitive topic regarding the production process of injection molds. Therefore, choose an experienced company that has made a name in the industry for its quality. The plastic industry is very competitive. So you will find several companies competing against each other. This forces them to take measures for cost-cutting to attract more customers. But make sure that these measures do not affect the quality. Therefore choose a service provider with a dedicated quality control team. Some companies even offer the involvement of the client team to get the appropriate quality and required design.

Moreover, you can also conduct background research to understand the actual situation of a service provider. Getting reviews from their previous clients and researching their portfolios is also a good option. You also consider their mold maintenance programs, as these maintain the quality of the molds and affect the final designs. Similarly, ask them about their project management software to understand their work. The consideration should also include an inspection process for understanding their quality assurance process. Finally, look for their ISO certification to ensure they align with the highest quality standards.

Time consideration

The time limit is also significant in determining the prototype injection molding services. Suppose they provide the best quality products but are delivered after the timeline you need. Then, there is no benefit to working with such a service provider. The process of mold building can take up to 4 to 12 weeks. So the designers need to consider several steps, such as design revisions, the complexity of the production, etc., within the same timeframe.

Sometimes, unexpected delays can also occur due to the unavailability of raw materials, tampering with the resin, shipping delays, etc. So when determining the final service provider, consider all these factors before making the final decision. Take a realistic estimate of the total time taken for the design.

Diversity of markets

A prototype injection molding service that serves a diverse market is an excellent option to choose from. This means they have experience working with diverse designs for a wide spectrum of user purposes. Moreover, a diverse market also means better quality control measures. Finally, a diverse market range also means different resource availability to a much larger extent, which is especially beneficial in terms of last-minute issues.

Conclusion

A prototype injection molding company should have robust quality assurance. This will help get the best production results for each product. Moreover, they should have a good design team to understand the client&#;s requirements. The design team should be able to come into the picture in the early design stages. In addition, technological availability is the next determining factor. A service provider should have access to advance technology to get efficient production results. Finally, the capacity and volume of production also make determining factors.